Prolegomena · Text of the first edition, 1687
Titulus, Dedicatio, Præfatio, Carmen
Title page, dedication, preface and Halley’s ode
Latin complete · fully annotated
Headnote
The front matter of the first edition, published in London in the summer of 1687: a title page carrying the Royal Society’s licence, signed by its president Samuel Pepys; a dedication to the Society; Newton’s preface to the reader; and a Latin ode by Edmond Halley, who paid for the printing himself and saw the book through the press. The preface is the best short statement Newton ever wrote of what the book is for.
Sentence by sentence 57 Latin sentences on this page, each paired with one English sentence. Select a Latin sentence and its English comes alongside; select an English sentence and the page brings the Latin to the centre, then the English follows. Arrow keys step, Esc clears. Where the 1687 page sets a word apart (roman in italic text, italic in roman text), the English sets its counterpart apart too; hover either to light the other.
PHILOSOPHIÆ NATURALIS PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA
Autore IS. NEWTON, Trin. Coll. Cantab. Soc. Matheseos
Professore Lucasiano, & Societatis Regalis Sodali.
IMPRIMATUR.
S. PEPYS, Reg. Soc. PRÆSES.
Julii 5. 1686.
LONDINI,
Jussu Societatis Regiæ ac Typis Josephi Streater.
Prostat apud
plures Bibliopolas. Anno MDCLXXXVII.
MATHEMATICAL PRINCIPLES
OF NATURAL PHILOSOPHY
By IS. NEWTON, Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, Lucasian
Professor of Mathematics, and Fellow of the Royal Society.
LET IT BE PRINTED.
S. PEPYS, PRESIDENT of the Royal Society.
5 July 1686.
LONDON,
By order of the Royal Society, printed by Joseph Streater.
Sold by several booksellers. In the year 1687.
The title page
The gist, in plain English
Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. By Is. Newton, Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, Lucasian Professor of Mathematics, and Fellow of the Royal Society. Imprimatur (let it be printed): S. Pepys, President of the Royal Society, 5 July 1686. London, by order of the Royal Society and printed by Joseph Streater. Sold by several booksellers. In the year 1687.
Words
- Philosophiæ Naturalis
- “of natural philosophy”: what we call physics, then a branch of philosophy
- Principia Mathematica
- “mathematical principles”: the starting points, put mathematically
- Trin. Coll. Cantab. Soc.
- Trinitatis Collegii Cantabrigiensis Socius, Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge
- Imprimatur
- “let it be printed”: the licence to publish
- Prostat apud plures Bibliopolas
- “on sale at several booksellers’”
ILLUSTRISSIMÆ
SOCIETATI REGALI
a Serenissimo
REGE CAROLO II.
AD
PHILOSOPHIAM PROMOVENDAM
FUNDATÆ,
ET AUSPICIIS
POTENTISSIMI MONARCHÆ
JACOBI II.
FLORENTI.
Tractatum hunc humillime D.D.D.
IS. NEWTON.
TO THE MOST ILLUSTRIOUS
ROYAL SOCIETY,
founded by the most serene
KING CHARLES II.
FOR
THE ADVANCEMENT OF PHILOSOPHY,
AND FLOURISHING
UNDER THE AUSPICES
OF THE MOST POWERFUL MONARCH
JAMES II.
This treatise is most humbly given, presented and dedicated by
IS. NEWTON.
The dedication
The gist, in plain English
To the most illustrious Royal Society, founded by the most serene King Charles II for the advancement of philosophy, and flourishing under the auspices of the most powerful monarch James II, Is. Newton most humbly gives, presents and dedicates this treatise.
Words
- ad philosophiam promovendam
- “for the advancement of philosophy”
- auspiciis
- under the auspices, patronage
- D.D.D.
- dat, donat, dedicat: gives, presents and dedicates (a standard formula)
Commentary
A formality, but a dated one. James II was deposed in the Revolution of 1688, eighteen months later. Newton, a firm Protestant who had already resisted James’s pressure on Cambridge, sat for the University in the Convention Parliament of 1689 that settled the crown on William and Mary.
PRÆFATIO
AD
LECTOREM.
Cum Veteres Mechanicam (uti Author est Pappus) in verum Naturalium investigatione maximi fecerint, & recentiores, missis formis substantialibus & qualitatibus occultis, Phænomena Naturæ ad leges Mathematicas revocare aggressi sint: Visum est in hoc Tractatu Mathesin excolere quatenus ea ad Philosophiam spectat. Mechanicam vero duplicem Veteres constituerunt: Rationalem quæ per Demonstrationes accurate procedit, & Practicam. Ad practicam spectant Artes omnes Manuales, a quibus utiq; Mechanica nomen mutuata est. Cum autem Artifices parum accurate operari soleant, fit ut Mechanica omnis a Geometria ita distinguatur, ut quicquid accuratum sit ad Geometriam referatur, quicquid minus accuratum ad Mechanicam. Attamen errores non sunt Artis sed Artificum. Qui minus accurate operatur, imperfectior est Mechanicus, & si quis accuratissime operari posset, hic foret Mechanicus omnium perfectissimus. Nam & Linearum rectarum & Circulorum descriptiones in quibus Geometria fundatur, ad Mechanicam pertinent. Has lineas describere Geometria non docet sed postulat. Postulat enim ut Tyro easdem accurate describere prius didicerit quam limen attingat Geometriæ; dein, quomodo per has operationes Problemata solvantur, docet. Rectas & circulos describere Problemata sunt sed non Geometrica. Ex Mechanica postulatur horum solutio, in Geometria docetur solutorum usus. Ac gloriatur Geometria quod tam paucis principiis aliunde petitis tam multa præstet. Fundatur igitur Geometria in praxi Mechanica, & nihil aliud est quam Mechanicæ universalis pars illa quæ artem mensurandi accurate proponit ac demonstrat. Cum autem artes Manuales in corporibus movendis præcipue versentur, fit ut Geometria ad magnitudinem, Mechanica ad motum vulgo reseratur. Quo sensu Mechanica rationalis erit Scientia Motuum qui ex viribus quibuscunq; resultant, & virium quæ ad motus quoscunq; requiruntur, accurate proposita ac demonstrata. Pars hæc Mechanicæ a Veteribus in Potentiis quinque ad artes manuales spectantibus exculta fuit, qui Gravitatem (cum potentia manualis non sit) vix aliter quam in ponderibus per potentias illas movendis considerarunt. Nos autem non Artibus sed Philosophiæ consulentes, deq; potentiis non manualibus sed naturalibus scribentes, ea maxime tractamus quæ ad Gravitatem, levitatem, vim Elasticam, resistentiam Fluidorum & ejusmodi vires seu attractivas seu impulsivas spectant: Et ea propter hæc nostra tanquam Philosophiæ principia Mathematica proponimus. Omnis enim Philosophiæ difficultas in eo versari videtur, ut a Phænomenis motuum investigemus vires Naturæ, deinde ab his viribus demonstremus phænomena reliqua. Et hac spectant Propositiones generales quas Libro primo & secundo pertractavimus. In Libro autem tertio exemplum hujus rei proposuimus per explicationem Systematis mundani. Ibi enim, ex phænomenis cælestibus, per Propositiones in Libris prioribus Mathematice demonstratas, derivantur vires gravitatis quibus corpora ad Solem & Planetas singulos tendunt. Deinde ex his viribus per Propositiones etiam Mathematicas deducuntur motus Planetarum, Cometarum, Lunæ & Maris. Utinam cætera Naturæ phænomena ex principiis Mechanicis eodem argumentandi genere derivare liceret. Nam multa me movent ut nonnihil suspicer ea omnia ex viribus quibusdam pendere posse, quibus corporum particulæ per causas nondum cognitas vel in se mutuo impelluntur & secundum figuras regulares cohærent, vel ab invicem fugantur & recedunt: quibus viribus ignotis, Philosophi hactenus Naturam frustra tentarunt. Spero autem quod vel huic Philosophandi modo, vel veriori alicui, Principia hic posita lucem aliquam præbebunt.
In his edendis, Vir acutissimus & in omni literarum genere eruditissimus Edmundus Halleius operam navavit, nec solum Typothetarum Sphalmata correxit & Schemata incidi curavit, sed etiam Author fuit ut horum editionem aggrederer. Quippe cum demonstratam a me figuram Orbium cælestium impetraverat, rogare non destitit ut eadem cum Societate Regali communicarem, Quæ deinde hortatibus & benignis suis auspiciis effecit ut de eadem in lucem emittenda cogitare inciperem. At postquam Motuum Lunarium inæqualitates aggressus essem, deinde etiam alia tentare cæpissem quæ ad leges mensuras Gravitatis & aliarum virium, ad figuras a corporibus secundum datas quascunque leges attractis describendas, ad motus corporum plurium inter se, ad motus corporum in Mediis resistentibus, ad vires, densitates & motus Mediorum, ad Orbes Cometarum & similia spectant, editionem in aliud tempus differendam esse putavi, ut cætera rimarer & una in publicum darem. Quæ ad motus Lunares spectant, (imperfecta cum sint,) in Corollariis Propositionis LXVI. simul complexus sum, ne singula methodo prolixiore quam pro rei dignitate proponere, & sigillatim demonstrare tenerer, & seriem reliquarum Propositionum interrumpere. Nonnulla sero inventa locis minus idoneis inserere malui, quam numerum Propositionum & citationes mutare. Ut omnia candide legantur, & defectus, in materia tam difficili non tam reprehendantur, quam novis Lectorum conatibus investigentur, & benigne suppleantur, enixe rogo.
Preface
to the
Reader.
Since the ancients (as Pappus tells us) held mechanics in the highest esteem in the study of nature, and the moderns, setting aside substantial forms and occult qualities, have undertaken to bring the phenomena of nature under mathematical laws, I have decided in this treatise to develop mathematics so far as it bears on natural philosophy. Now the ancients divided mechanics into two kinds: the rational, which proceeds exactly by demonstrations, and the practical. To practical mechanics belong all the manual arts, and it is from them, indeed, that mechanics borrowed its name. But because craftsmen usually work without much exactness, mechanics as a whole has come to be distinguished from geometry in such a way that whatever is exact is assigned to geometry, and whatever is less exact to mechanics. Yet the errors belong not to the art but to those who practise it. Whoever works less exactly is a less perfect mechanic, and if anyone could work with perfect exactness, he would be the most perfect mechanic of all. For the drawing of straight lines and of circles, on which geometry is founded, is itself a matter of mechanics. Geometry does not teach us how to draw these lines; it postulates it. For it requires that the beginner have learned to draw them exactly before he reaches the threshold of geometry; then it teaches how problems are solved by means of these operations. To draw straight lines and circles are problems, but not geometrical ones. Their solution is demanded of mechanics, and geometry teaches the use of them once solved. And geometry prides itself on achieving so much from so few principles, borrowed from elsewhere. Geometry, therefore, is founded on mechanical practice, and is nothing other than that part of universal mechanics which sets out and demonstrates exactly the art of measuring. But since the manual arts are chiefly concerned with moving bodies, geometry is commonly associated with magnitude and mechanics with motion. In this sense rational mechanics will be the science, exactly set out and demonstrated, of the motions that result from any forces whatever, and of the forces required to produce any motions whatever. The ancients cultivated this part of mechanics in the five powers that belong to the manual arts, and they considered gravity (since it is not a manual power) scarcely otherwise than in the moving of weights by those powers. But since I write with philosophy in view rather than the arts, and of natural rather than manual powers, I deal chiefly with what concerns gravity, levity, elastic force, the resistance of fluids and other such forces, whether attractive or impulsive: and for that reason I offer this work as the mathematical principles of philosophy. For the whole difficulty of philosophy seems to lie in this: to discover the forces of nature from the phenomena of motions, and then from these forces to demonstrate the other phenomena. The general propositions worked out in the first and second books are directed to this end. In the third book I have given an example of this by explaining the system of the world. For there, from the celestial phenomena, by means of propositions proved mathematically in the earlier books, are derived the forces of gravity by which bodies tend toward the Sun and toward each of the planets. Then from these forces, again by mathematical propositions, the motions of the planets, the comets, the Moon and the sea are deduced. Would that the rest of the phenomena of nature could be derived from mechanical principles by the same kind of reasoning. For many things lead me to suspect that they may all depend on certain forces by which the particles of bodies, for causes not yet known, are either driven toward one another and cohere in regular figures, or are repelled and recede from one another: and because these forces have been unknown, philosophers have so far made their attempts on nature in vain. But I hope that the principles set down here will throw some light either on this way of doing philosophy or on some truer one.
In the publishing of this work Edmond Halley, a man of the sharpest mind and learned in every branch of letters, gave his help: he not only corrected the printers’ errors and had the figures engraved, but was also the one who persuaded me to undertake its publication. For when he had obtained from me my demonstration of the shape of the celestial orbits, he never stopped asking me to communicate it to the Royal Society, which then, by its encouragement and kind patronage, led me to begin thinking of making it public. But after I had taken up the inequalities of the Moon’s motions, and had then begun to try other things as well (the laws and measures of gravity and of other forces, the figures described by bodies attracted according to any given laws, the motions of several bodies among themselves, the motions of bodies in resisting media, the forces, densities and motions of media, the orbits of comets and the like), I thought the publication should be put off to another time, so that I might search out the rest and bring it all before the public together. What concerns the Moon’s motions (being incomplete) I have gathered together in the corollaries of Proposition LXVI, so as not to be obliged to set out and prove each point separately by a longer method than the subject deserves, and so break the sequence of the remaining propositions. Some things found late I preferred to insert in less suitable places rather than change the numbering of the propositions and the cross-references. I earnestly ask that everything be read with good will, and that its shortcomings, in so difficult a subject, be not so much faulted as investigated and kindly made good by the fresh efforts of readers.
Newton’s preface to the reader
The gist, in plain English
The ancients (as Pappus reports) prized mechanics most highly in the investigation of nature, and the moderns, rejecting substantial forms and occult qualities, have set out to bring natural phenomena under mathematical laws. So in this treatise I have cultivated mathematics as far as it relates to natural philosophy.
The ancients made mechanics twofold: rational, which proceeds accurately by demonstration, and practical, which covers all the manual arts and gives mechanics its name. Because craftsmen work inaccurately, people distinguish mechanics from geometry by putting everything accurate in geometry and everything less accurate in mechanics. But the errors belong to the craftsman, not to the art. Even geometry rests on mechanics: drawing straight lines and circles is a mechanical problem, which geometry does not teach but postulates. Geometry is therefore founded on mechanical practice, and is simply the part of universal mechanics that accurately sets out and proves the art of measuring. Since the manual arts are mainly about moving bodies, geometry is usually linked to magnitude and mechanics to motion. In that sense rational mechanics is the science, accurately set out and proved, of the motions that result from any forces, and of the forces required for any motions.
The ancients developed this part of mechanics in the five powers (simple machines) and treated gravity only as a weight to be moved by them. We, writing for philosophy rather than the arts, about natural rather than manual powers, deal chiefly with gravity, levity, elastic force, the resistance of fluids and such forces, attractive or impulsive. That is why we offer this work as mathematical principles of philosophy. For the whole difficulty of philosophy seems to be this: from the phenomena of motions to investigate the forces of nature, and then from these forces to demonstrate the other phenomena. The general propositions of Books I and II are aimed at this. In Book III we give an example by explaining the system of the world: from the celestial phenomena, by propositions proved mathematically in the earlier books, we derive the forces of gravity by which bodies tend toward the Sun and the several planets; then from these forces, again by mathematical propositions, we deduce the motions of the planets, comets, Moon and sea.
I wish the rest of nature’s phenomena could be derived from mechanical principles by the same kind of reasoning. For many things lead me to suspect that they may all depend on certain forces by which the particles of bodies, for causes not yet known, are either driven toward one another and cohere in regular figures, or are repelled and recede from one another. Since these forces are unknown, philosophers have so far tried to understand nature in vain. But I hope the principles laid down here will shed some light either on this way of philosophising or on some truer one.
In publishing this, the most acute and universally learned Edmond Halley not only corrected the printer’s errors and had the figures engraved, but was the reason I undertook the edition at all. When he had obtained from me my demonstration of the shape of the celestial orbits, he kept asking me to communicate it to the Royal Society, which by its encouragement led me to think of publishing it. But after I began on the inequalities of the lunar motions, and then on other matters (the laws and measures of gravity and other forces, the figures described by bodies attracted by any given laws, the motions of several bodies among themselves, motion in resisting media, the forces, densities and motions of media, the orbits of comets and the like), I thought publication should wait until I had explored the rest and could issue it all together. The lunar material, being imperfect, I have put together in the corollaries of Proposition LXVI, rather than prove each point at length and break the sequence of propositions. Some things found late I preferred to insert in less suitable places rather than change the numbering of the propositions and the citations. I earnestly ask that everything be read with indulgence, and that the defects in so difficult a subject be not so much blamed as investigated and kindly supplied by the new efforts of readers.
Words
- Pappus
- Pappus of Alexandria (4th century), whose Collection preserved Greek mechanics and geometry
- formæ substantiales
- “substantial forms”: the scholastic-Aristotelian explanatory principles the moderns rejected
- Mathesis
- mathematics
- postulat
- “postulates”: demands as a given (as Euclid’s postulates demand the drawing of lines and circles)
- Tyro
- a beginner, novice
- potentiæ quinque
- the five powers: lever, wheel and axle, pulley, wedge, screw
- levitas
- levity: supposed natural upward tendency; Newton lists it among forces to be investigated
- a Phænomenis motuum investigemus vires
- “from the phenomena of motions we investigate the forces”
- Typothetarum Sphalmata
- “the compositors’ slips”, i.e. misprints
- schemata incidi curavit
- “saw to the engraving of the figures”
- candide
- candidly: with good will, fairly
Commentary
The concrete problem Newton is answering. In 1687 "philosophy" explained nature by kinds: a stone falls because heaviness belongs to its nature. The mechanical philosophers (Descartes, Boyle, Huygens) replaced that with matter in motion, pushes and collisions, but produced qualitative stories, not numbers. Newton proposes something narrower and much stronger, and the key sentence is in bold above:
Go up from observed motion to force (Kepler’s laws give the inverse square), then down from force to motions nobody had yet explained: lunar inequalities, tides, the precession of the equinoxes, comets. The first arrow makes the second one possible. That two-way programme is still how physics works.
Geometry is a kind of mechanics. The opening argument looks pedantic but is not. Since antiquity geometry had been the model of certainty and mechanics the inexact work of craftsmen. Newton reverses the ranking: Euclid postulates that you can draw lines and circles, which are mechanical acts, so geometry is the exact part of mechanics. That makes room for a "rational mechanics" with the same standard of proof as Euclid but about motion and force. The book is written in that geometrical style for that reason.
The suspicion about particles. The paragraph beginning Utinam ("I wish…") is a research programme for two centuries: short-range attractive and repulsive forces between particles explaining cohesion, chemistry and light. Compare the last paragraph of the General Scholium, written twenty-six years later.
Halley. The story behind "when he had obtained from me my demonstration" is told in the Introduction: Halley’s visit to Cambridge in August 1684 and the tract De motu that followed. The thanks are sincere, and as it happens they do not mention the money Halley spent.
IN
VIRI PRÆSTANTISSIMI
D. ISAACI NEWTONI
OPUS HOCCE
MATHEMATICO-PHYSICUM
Sæculi Gentisque nostræ Decus egregium.
En tibi norma Poli, & divæ libramina Molis,
Computus atque Jovis; quas, dum primordia rerum
Pangeret, omniparens Leges violare Creator
Noluit, æternique operis fundamina fixit.
Intima panduntur victi penetralia cæli,
Nec latet extremos quæ Vis circumrotat Orbes.
Sol solio residens ad se jubet omnia prono
Tendere descensu, nec recto tramite currus
Sidereos patitur vastum per inane moveri;
Sed rapit immotis, se centro, singula Gyris.
Jam patet horrificis quæ sit via flexa Cometis;
Jam non miramur barbati Phænomena Astri.
Discimus hinc tandem qua causa argentea Phœbe
Passibus haud æquis graditur; cur subdita nulli
Hactenus Astronomo numerorum fræna recuset:
Cur remeant Nodi, curque Auges progrediuntur.
Discimus & quantis refluum vaga Cynthia Pontum
Viribus impellit, dum fractis fluctibus Ulvam
Deserit, ac Nautis suspectas nudat arenas;
Alternis vicibus suprema ad littora pulsans.
Quæ toties animos veterum torsere Sophorum,
Quæque Scholas frustra rauco certamine vexant
Obvia conspicimus nubem pellente Mathesi.
Jam dubios nulla caligine prægravat error
Queis Superum penetrare domos atque ardua Cœli
Scandere sublimis Genii concessit acumen.
Surgite Mortales, terrenas mittite curas
Atque hinc cœligenæ vires dignoscite Mentis
A pecudum vita longe lateque remotæ.
Qui scriptis jussit Tabulis compescere Cædes
Furta & Adulteria, & perjuræ crimina Fraudis;
Quive vagis populis circumdare mœnibus Urbes
Autor erat; Cererisve beavit munere gentes;
Vel qui curarum lenimen pressit ab Uva;
Vel qui Niliaca monstravit arundine pictos
Consociare sonos, oculisque exponere Voces;
Humanam sortem minus extulit; utpote pauca
Respiciens miseræ solummodo commoda vitæ.
Jam vero Superis convivæ admittimur, alti
Jura poli tractare licet, jamque abdita cœcæ
Claustra patent Terræ rerumque immobilis ordo,
Et quæ præteriti latuerunt sæcula mundi.
Talia monstrantem mecum celebrate Camænis,
Vos qui cœlesti gaudetis nectare vesci,
NEWTONVM clausi reserantem scrinia Veri,
NEWTONVM Musis charum, cui pectore puro
Phœbus adest, totoque incessit Numine mentem:
Nec fas est propius Mortali attingere Divos.
EDM. HALLEY.
ON THIS
MATHEMATICO-PHYSICAL WORK
OF THE MOST EXCELLENT MAN
MR ISAAC NEWTON
The outstanding glory of our age and nation.
Behold the rule of the heavens, the balances of the divine mass,
and the reckoning of Jupiter: laws that, as he framed the first beginnings
of things, the Creator who brings forth all would not
break, and that he set as the foundations of his eternal work.
The inmost chambers of the conquered sky lie open,
and the Force that wheels the outermost orbs is hidden no more.
The Sun, enthroned, commands all things to tend towards him
in downward descent, and does not let the chariots
of the stars move in a straight path through the vast void,
but sweeps each one round in unmoving circles, himself the centre.
Now the curving road of the dreadful Comets is plain;
now we no longer marvel at the apparitions of the bearded Star.
From this we learn at last why silver Phoebe
walks with unequal steps; why, subject until now to no
astronomer, she has refused the reins of number;
why the Nodes go back, and why the Apsides advance.
We learn too with what great forces wandering Cynthia drives the ebbing Sea,
when, its waves broken, it leaves the sedge
behind, and bares the sands that Sailors dread,
beating by turns upon the highest shores.
Things that so often racked the minds of the ancient Sages,
and vex the Schools in vain with hoarse dispute,
we see plainly before us, now that Mathematics drives away the cloud.
Error no longer weighs down with any darkness the doubters
to whom the keenness of a lofty Genius has granted to enter the homes of the Gods
and to climb the heights of Heaven.
Rise, Mortals, cast away your earthly cares,
and learn from this the powers of a heaven-born Mind,
far and wide removed from the life of beasts.
He who by written Tables bade men curb Murder,
Theft and Adultery, and the crimes of perjured Fraud;
or he who first taught wandering peoples to ring their Cities with walls,
or blessed the nations with the gift of Ceres;
or he who pressed from the Grape a solace for our cares;
or he who showed how, with the reed of the Nile, painted
sounds are joined, and Voices set before the eyes:
each raised the human lot less high, since he looked
only to the few comforts of a wretched life.
But now we are admitted as guests of the Gods; we may handle
the laws of the high heavens; now the hidden vaults of the dark
Earth lie open, and the unmoving order of things,
and all that lay hidden from the ages of the world gone by.
Join me in singing, with the Camenae, the one who shows us such things,
you who delight to feast on heavenly nectar:
NEWTON, who unlocks the coffers of hidden Truth,
NEWTON, dear to the Muses, in whose pure breast
Phoebus dwells, whose mind he has entered with all his Godhead:
nearer the Gods no Mortal may approach.
EDM. HALLEY.
Halley’s ode to Newton
The gist, in plain English
On this mathematico-physical work of the most excellent Mr Isaac Newton, the outstanding glory of our age and nation.
Behold the rule of the heavens, the balances of the divine mass, the reckoning of Jupiter: laws which, when he was framing the beginnings of things, the all-making Creator would not break, and on which he fixed the foundations of his eternal work. The inmost chambers of the conquered sky are opened, and the force that turns the outermost orbs is hidden no longer. The Sun, sitting on his throne, bids all things tend toward him in downward descent, and does not let the starry chariots move through the vast void in a straight path, but sweeps each, himself the centre, around unmoving circles. Now we see the curved road of the dreadful comets; now we no longer marvel at the bearded star. We learn at last why silver Phoebe (the Moon) walks with unequal steps; why she has refused, till now, the reins of numbers to every astronomer; why the nodes go back and the apsides go forward. We learn too with what forces wandering Cynthia (the Moon again) drives the ebbing sea, when, its waves broken, it leaves the seaweed and lays bare the sands sailors fear, beating by turns on the highest shores.
The things that so often tormented the minds of the ancient sages, and vex the schools in vain with hoarse dispute, we see plainly, mathematics driving away the cloud. Error no longer weighs down with darkness those doubters to whom the sharpness of lofty genius has granted entry into the houses of the gods and the ascent of heaven’s heights.
Rise, mortals, put away earthly cares, and learn from this the powers of a heaven-born mind, far removed from the life of beasts. He who commanded murder, theft, adultery and the crimes of perjured fraud to be checked by written tablets; he who first walled cities for wandering peoples; he who blessed nations with the gift of Ceres; he who pressed from the grape a soothing for cares; he who showed how, with the reed of the Nile, to join painted sounds and set voices before the eyes: these raised the human lot less, since they looked only to the few comforts of a wretched life. But now we are admitted as guests of the gods; we may handle the laws of the high heavens; now the hidden vaults of the dark Earth lie open, and the unmoving order of things, and what lay hidden from the ages of the world gone by.
Celebrate with me in song the one who shows us these things, you who delight to feed on heavenly nectar: NEWTON, unlocking the coffers of hidden Truth, NEWTON, dear to the Muses, in whose pure breast Phoebus dwells and whose mind he has entered with all his godhead. Nearer the gods no mortal may approach.
Words
- norma Poli
- “the rule (carpenter’s square) of the heavens”
- libramina Molis
- “the balancings of the mass”: weights, gravity
- Computus Jovis
- “the reckoning of Jupiter”: the measured mass of Jupiter from its moons
- penetralia
- inner sanctum, innermost chambers
- barbatum Astrum
- “the bearded star”: a comet
- Phœbe / Cynthia
- poetic names of the Moon (Diana)
- Nodi / Auges
- the nodes and the apsides (apogee) of the lunar orbit
- Ulva
- sedge, seaweed
- Ceres
- goddess of grain: the inventor of agriculture
- Niliaca arundine
- “with the Nile reed”: the reed pen, i.e. writing
- scrinia
- document chests, archives
- fas
- what is divinely permitted
Commentary
What Halley chose to celebrate. Read as a table of contents, the ode is precise: the inverse-square attraction of the Sun (lines 7–10), comets as orbiting bodies rather than omens (11–12), the Moon’s irregular motion, regressing nodes and advancing apogee (13–16), and the tides (17–20). These are Book III’s results, and Halley, who had seen every proof sheet, knew exactly which ones were new.
The rhetorical move. The middle section compares Newton with the culture-heroes of antiquity: Moses the lawgiver, the founders of cities, Ceres (agriculture), Bacchus (wine), the inventors of writing. They improved "the few comforts of a wretched life." Newton has made men "guests of the gods." It is extravagant, but its claim, that understanding nature ranks above practical improvement, is one Newton’s own preface implies.
The last line, Nec fas est propius Mortali attingere Divos, became the most quoted line about Newton. The ode was altered in the second and third editions. The text here is Halley’s original of 1687.
Commentary
Read the title as an argument. Descartes had published Principia Philosophiæ (1644), a complete physics built from the principles of philosophy, with no equations at all. Newton’s title answers it in two words: Philosophiæ naturalis principia mathematica. Physics, he claims, starts from mathematical principles.
Pepys. The diarist was President of the Royal Society in 1686, so his name appears on the licence. The Society agreed to publish the book but had spent its money on Willughby’s History of Fishes, so the cost fell on Halley.